Publication Details

A note on the estimation of variance for big BAF sampling

Publication Toolbox

  • Download PDF (3.0 MB)
  • This publication is available only online.
​Gove, Jeffrey H.; Gregoire, Timothy G.; Ducey, Mark J.; Lynch, Thomas B.

Year Published

2020

Publication

Forest Ecosystems

Abstract

Background: The double sampling method known as "big BAF sampling" has been advocated as a way to reduce sampling effort while still maintaining a reasonably precise estimate of volume. A well-known method for variance determination, Bruce's method, is customarily used because the volume estimator takes the form of a product of random variables. However, the genesis of Bruce’s method is not known to most foresters who use the method in practice. Methods: We establish that the Taylor series approximation known as the Delta method provides a plausible explanation for the origins of Bruce's method. Simulations were conducted on two different tree populations to ascertain the similarities of the Delta method to the exact variance of a product. Additionally, two alternative estimators for the variance of individual tree volume-basal area ratios, which are part of the estimation process, were compared within the overall variance estimation procedure. Results: The simulation results demonstrate that Bruce’s method provides a robust method for estimating the variance of inventories conducted with the big BAF method. The simulations also demonstrate that the variance of the mean volume-basal area ratios can be computed using either the usual sample variance of the mean or the ratio variance estimators with equal accuracy, which had not been shown previously for Big BAF sampling. Conclusions: A plausible explanation for the origins of Bruce's method has been set forth both historically and mathematically in the Delta Method. In most settings, there is evidently no practical difference between applying the exact variance of a product or the Delta method—either can be used. A caution is articulated concerning the aggregation of tree-wise attributes into point-wise summaries in order to test the correlation between the two as a possible indicator of the need for further covariance augmentation.

Keywords

Bitterlich sampling; Delta method; Double sampling; Forest inventory; Horizontal point sampling; Variance of a product

Citation

​Gove, Jeffrey H.; Gregoire, Timothy G.; Ducey, Mark J.; Lynch, Thomas B. 2020. A note on the estimation of variance for big BAF sampling. Forest Ecosystems. 7: Article 62. 14 p. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40663-020-00272-X.​

Last updated on: December 1, 2020