You are here: NRS Home / Publications & Data / A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Cost-Effective Water Quality Management in Lakes

Publication Details

Publication Toolbox
  • Download PDF  (169 KB)
  • This publication is available only online.

A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Cost-Effective Water Quality Management in Lakes

Year Published

2006

Source

Environmental Management Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 411-425

Abstract

Roughly 45% of the assessed lakes in the United States are impaired for one or more reasons. Eutrophication due to excess phosphorus loading is common in many impaired lakes. Various strategies are available to lake residents for addressing declining lake water quality, including septic system upgrades and establishing riparian buffers. This study examines 25 lakes to determine whether septic upgrades or riparian buffers are a more cost-effective strategy to meet a phosphorus reduction target. We find that riparian buffers are the more cost-effective strategy in every case but one. Large transaction costs associated with the negotiation and monitoring of riparian buffers, however, may be prohibiting lake residents from implementing the most cost-effective strategy.

Keywords

Citation

Kramer, Daniel Boyd; Polasky, Stephen; Starfield, Anthony; Palik, Brian; Westphal, Lynn; Snyder, Stephanie; Jakes, Pamela; Hudson, Rachel; Gustafson, Eric 2006. A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Cost-Effective Water Quality Management in Lakes. Environmental Management Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 411-425
Last updated on: February 5, 2008

NRS at a Glance