The process of timber harvesting is comprised of five basic tasks:
- Timber acquisition (moving to the tree).
- Felling and preparing the tree for extraction (delimbing, topping, and segmenting).
- Extracting the tree to a central location or landing (skidding or forwarding).
- Loading the tree for transport to the mill.
- Transporting the tree to a mill.
The processing of the tree into individual products (e.g., veneer logs, sawlogs, pulpwood) may occur at either the stump or at the landing. A variety of equipment options can be used to accomplish each task (Tables 1 and Table 2 below).
Harvesting systems are named based on the form in which the wood arrives at the landing. The three general types of harvesting systems include shortwood, tree-length, and full-tree. We will focus our discussion on the tasks of moving to the tree, felling the tree, processing it at the stump, and transporting the tree to the landing.
There are a variety of equipment options that can be used with each harvesting system. While a
given harvest system can be used to accomplish any silvicultural objective (Table 3 below), there are distinct advantages and disadvantages for each that need to be considered (Table 4 below). While a shortwood system is suited to all types of management, a full-tree system is better suited to a production requirement because equipment frequently tends to be larger and to operate faster than for the other systems.
Light-on-the-land operations
Light-on-the-land
(LOL) is
an approach
to timber
harvesting
that uses
techniques
and equipment
designed
to minimize
site and
stand impacts.
To be successful,
business
owners
and on-the-ground
operators
need to
understand
and apply
light-on-the-land
approaches
too. Operators
who have
and apply
a light-on-the-land
ethic are
critical.
As all
sites and
conditions
do not
require
the same
treatment,
and there
may be
many ways
to accomplish
a silvicultural
objective
through
logging,
it is important
to recognize
where LOL
approaches
are needed.
The need
for LOL
increases
as:
-
the silvicultural prescription includes more residual trees because of the need to protect those remaining trees from scarring and rot damage and because it takes more time and care to work around residual trees, and;
-
site conditions warrant (e.g., soils that are wet, non-frozen, or have more loam, silt, or clay; steep topography).
Light-on-the-land techniques
Individual state best management practices or forest management guidebooks often include a wealth of LOL techniques to protect water quality and site productivity such as:
-
Combine and integrate management activities to reduce trafficking on the site
-
Avoid unnecessary stand re-entry
-
Operate on snow or when soils are frozen or dry
-
Avoid operating during periods when insect infestations are possible
-
Avoid rutting within the site and hydrologic impacts from roads and skid trails
-
Divert water from roads, skid trails, and landings
-
Revegetate exposed areas
-
Infrastructure (roads, skid trails, and landings)
-
Minimize within the harvest site
-
Share between harvest sites
-
Plan during stand establishment
-
Use designated trails
-
Avoid full-tree harvesting on nutrient-sensitive sites
-
Retain or redistribute slash on nutrient-sensitive sites
-
Operate machinery along the contours, rather than up and down slopes
-
Store lubricants and fuels in appropriate (e.g., approved, labeled) containers that are located away from water
-
Incorporate and administer appropriate regulations in the timber sale contract
Techniques that do not often appear in guidebooks include:
-
When thinning a stand, mark it so that there is enough room for equipment to operate
-
Final cuts in shelterwood, seed tree, or other situations where natural regeneration has established should be planned for winter when snow cover protects seedlings and the soil is frozen
-
Swing trees out of sensitive areas using felling machinery. Use the full reach of a mechanical boom whenever possible.
-
Minimize turning and curves when planning skidding trails during thinning operations. The best skid trail route is generally the straightest possible, over the most level terrain.
-
Locate skid trails to accommodate future as well as current harvests. Use designated skid trails to reduce trail density and to control the path of skidders and forwarders.
-
Select open areas along skid trails where skidders and forwarders can turn around and then back up to a load.
-
Consider the dimensions of logging equipment when planning trails and roads. Where possible, match equipment size to the size of the timber to be harvested. Because they are shorter and can maneuver more easily through residual trees, horses and forwarders may be a better choice than skidders.
-
For thinning operations,
-
Consider use of a tree-length or shortwood harvesting system as the tree size (i.e., length or the material and elimination of the branches and top material) is reduced as compared to the full-tree system.
-
Use directional felling techniques to align stems at a thirty to forty-five degree angle to the trail to limit trafficking
-
Cut stumps as low as possible on skid trails to reduce load shifting.
-
Designate bumper/rub/turn trees at curves and turns in the skid trail to protect the residual trees from scarring.
-
If ground strength permits, maximize payloads to reduce the number of required trips.
-
Communicate the harvest plans to the buyer and on-the-ground operator(s) through an on-site walkover conducted prior to commencing any harvesting activities.
Light-on-the-land equipment
In addition to the techniques identified above, existing equipment may be modified or other equipment used to address specific concerns. Some of the possible options are noted below.
- Apply temporary crossing structures over areas with weak soils
| Wood mats |
Wood
pallets |
![[graphic] Wood mats](../../img/har/woodmats_sm.jpg) |
![[photo] Wood pallets](../../img/har/woodpallets_sm.jpg) |
| |
|
| Drive
on slash
mats
or corduroy |
Wood
aggregate |
![[photo] Drive on slash mats or corduroy](../../img/har/corduroy_sm.jpg) |
![[photo] Wood aggregate](../../img/har/woodaggreagte_sm.jpg) |
| |
|
| HDPE
plastic |
|
![[photo] HDPE plastic](../../img/har/hdpeplasticroad_sm.jpg) |
|
Tree-to-tree feller-bunchers traverse more of the area and lead to more scarification than excavator-type feller-bunchers or chain saw felling
As compared to tree-length skidding, full-tree skidding increases scarification because limbs act as a rake. If organic matter is thick or understory vegetation is dense the opposite may be true.
Skidding increases the amount of scarification over forwarding since limbs or tops are allowed to drag.
Felling machines with the ability to remove trees from both the front and side of the machine allow you to thin within leave rows. Select machinery with zero or minimal tail swing so that the machine’s width is no wider than the tires or tracks.
Availability of a small felling machine with a narrow forwarder or skidding allows you to specify a narrower thinning corridor. The tradeoff may be that you remove more rows because of the limited reach of the machinery.
Mechanical fellers (e.g., cut-to-length feller processor) with a telescoping boom better protect the overhead components of the stand than does a knuckleboom.
Table 1. Basic harvesting components, associated activities, and options for accomplishing each component.
| Component |
Possible activities |
Options |
| Timber acquisition |
Move to tree prior to felling |
WalkMachine
(rubber
or
tracked)
Drive-to-tree
Swing-to-tree
|
| Felling |
Fell, limb, top, buck into individual products |
Chain
sawMechanical
Bunching operation
No bunching
|
| Primary transportation |
Move felled tree(s) to central landing |
Animal
Horse
Skidder
(rubber
or
tracked)
Cable
Grapple
Clambunk
Forwarder
Cable
yarding
|
| Processing |
Delimb, buck/slash into individual products, debark, chip, or no processing |
DelimberChain
saw
buckingMechanical
slasherDebarkerChipper |
| Loading |
Load products onto or into over-the-road vehicle |
LoaderForwarder |
| Secondary transport |
Over-the-road vehicle transports products to mill |
TrailerChip
van |
-
TOP
OF THE
PAGE -
Table 2. Characteristics of timber harvesting systems in Minnesota.
|
Characteristic |
Shortwood |
Tree-length |
Full-tree |
| Felling equipment |
Chain
saw
Harvester |
Chain
saw
Feller-buncher
Harvester |
Chain
saw
Feller-buncher |
| Off-road
transport
equipment |
Forwarder
Cable
skidder
(limited
use) |
Cable
skidder
Grapple
skidder
Cable
yarder
Horses |
| Delimbing
and
topping
location |
Stump area |
Stump
area
Cut-over
(concentratedwithin
cut-over) |
Roadside
Not
delimbed |
| Bucking location |
Stump area |
Roadside
Off-site
Not
bucked |
| Slash distribution |
Evenly
spread
Windrows |
Evenly
spread
Small
piles |
Roadside
piles
No
slash
left |
| Roadside
landing
requirements
and
impact |
Small |
Large |
Largest |
| Maximum
effective
off-road
transport
distance |
2000 ft. |
Cable & grapple
skidders
-
1000
ft. |
| Access road requirement1 |
27 ft./acre |
Cable & grapple
skidders
-
40
ft./acre |
| Area with vehicular traffic |
Low |
Cable & grapple
skidders
-
heavy |
| Ground disturbance - dry |
Low |
Moderate |
Heavy |
| Ground disturbance - frozen |
Minimal |
Low |
Low |
| Ground disturbance - wet |
Moderate |
Heavy |
Heavy |
| Protection of residual trees and regeneration |
Good |
Moderate |
Poor |
Source:
Jaako Pöyry
Consulting,
Inc. 1992.
Harvesting
systems:
A background
paper
for a Generic
Environmental
Impact
Statement
on timber
harvesting
and forest
management
in Minnesota.
Jaako
Pöyry
Consulting,
Inc.,
Tarrytown,
NY. 50
p.
1
Length of road required, on average, to access an area for logging.
- TOP
OF THE
PAGE -
Table 3. Applicability of timber harvesting systems to silvicultural systems and operations.
|
Operation |
Shortwood |
Tree-length |
Full-tree |
|
EVEN-AGE |
clearcutting
clearcutting
w/
standing
snags & live
trees
patch
cutting
alternate
strip
cutting
progressive
strip
cutting |
Good |
shelterwood
cutting |
Good |
Moderate |
Poor |
seed
tree
cutting |
Good |
Good |
Moderate |
|
UNEVEN-AGE |
individual
tree
selective
cutting |
Good |
Poor |
Poor |
group
selective
cutting |
Good |
Moderate |
Poor |
|
OTHER
|
selective
thinning |
Good |
Poor |
Poor |
row
thinning |
Moderate |
overstory
removal
(shelterwood & seed
tree) |
Source:
Jaako Pöyry
Consulting,
Inc. 1992.
Harvesting
systems:
A background
paper
for a Generic
Environmental
Impact
Statement
on timber
harvesting
and forest
management
in Minnesota.
Jaako
Pöyry
Consulting,
Inc.,
Tarrytown,
NY. 50
p.
- TOP
OF THE
PAGE -
Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages for the three harvesting systems.
|
Harvesting system |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|
SHORTWOOD |
Low
initial
investment
and
operating
costs
(sometimes)Less
adverse
site
impactsStems
remain
clean
and
are
less
prone
to
breakageResidues
remain
at
the
stumpBranches
and
slash
may
be
left
on
skid
trails,
protecting
soil
and
rootsLess
support
equipment
neededSmaller
landings
neededSkid
trails
may
be
meanderingNarrower
skid
trails
needed |
High
initial
investment
and
operating
costs
(sometimes)Lower
productionMay
be
labor
intensive
(skilled
labor,
workers'
compensation)Can't
put
on
a
heavy
load
on
steeper
slopesSlash
mat
may
be
inadequate
to
fully
support
some
equipment |
|
TREE-LENGTH |
Branches
remain
at
the
stumpIn-stand
residue
helps
to
protect
the
soil
from
machine
trafficRoadside
slash
is
greatly
reducedLandings
are
somewhat
smallerSkid
trails
don't
have
to
be
as
wideBumper
trees
for
load
compression
are
less
critical |
Wood
tends
to
be
dirtySoil
damage
in
skid
trails
may
be
greater
if
branches
are
not
left
on
the
trailsDamage
to
residual
trees
and
seedlings
may
be
greater/Bumper
trees
are
needed |
|
FULL-TREE |
Maximizes
volume
recovery/unit
area Highly
mechanized
with
high
productivity Less
labor/unit
volume Concentrates
many
operations
at
a
central
point,
permitting
bulk
operations. This is a particular advantage when trees are small Softwood
limbs
reduce
soil
disturbance
and
damage
to
residual
stand Cutover
area
is
left
clear
of
residue,
minimizing
site
preparation
and
planting
costs Generally
the
lowest
possible
harvest
cost/unit |
High
initial
investment
and
operating
costRequires
a
lot
of
support
equipment/larger
landing
space
is
requiredMoves
are
more
expensive More
timber
required
in
short-
and
long-runMachines
may
be
heavy,
causing
root
damage,
soil
compaction,
and
possible
ruttingHigh
flotation
tires
may
be
needed,
thus
increasing
cost
and
minimum
trail
widthLimbs
increase
load
width
and
may
cause
damage
to
residualsLoss
of
high
value
may
occurMay
result
in
more
slash
at
the
landingResidues
are
not
left
at
the
stumpMore
seed
cones
and
nutrients
are
removed
from
the
forest |